- #Fast self booting cpu stress test Patch#
- #Fast self booting cpu stress test code#
- #Fast self booting cpu stress test free#
Accesses require proper chip selects and addresses sent to the array - and not a lot more. Remember that RAM is an array divided into columns and rows. It's a seductively easy approach that will find an occasional problem (like, someone forgot to load all of the RAM chips), but that detects few real world errors. Too many developers use the simplest of tests - writing alternating 0x55 and 0xAA values to the entire memory array, and then reading the data to ensure it remains accessible. Perhaps RAM tests are simply not required given these extra resources. If the chip includes protection mechanisms (like the x86 protected mode), count on bad stack reads immediately causing protection faults your handlers can process.
#Fast self booting cpu stress test code#
Again, if the system is a critical life support application it may indeed make sense to run a test as even a minuscule probability of a fault may spell disaster.ĭoes it make sense to ignore RAM failures? If your CPU has an illegal instruction trap, there's a pretty good chance that memory problems will cause a code crash you can capture and process. In the case of a microcontroller with on-board RAM the chances of a memory failure that doesn't also kill the CPU is small. Remember that today's hardware is often very highly integrated. Next, inject a dose of reality into your evaluation. Is production test - or even engineering test - the real motivation for writing diagnostic code? If so, then define exactly what problems you're looking for and write code that will find those sorts of troubles. if it's dead I'll take it in for repair or replacement. As a consumer I couldn't care less why the phone stopped working. Is such a failure merely a nuisance? For instance, if it keeps a cell phone from booting, if there's nothing the customer can do about the failure anyway, then perhaps there's no reason for doing a test. Will a RAM problem kill someone? If so, a very comprehensive test, run regularly, is mandatory. Why run the test? What will the result be? Who will be the unlucky recipient of the bad news in the event an error is found, and what do you expect that person to do? So, my first belief about diagnostics in general, and RAM tests in particular, is to clearly define your goals.
In some applications, though, a certain amount of self-diagnosis either makes sense or is required critical life support applications should use every diagnostic concept possible to avoid disaster due to a sub-micron RAM imperfection. It's our responsibility to build a system that works properly when the hardware is functional. There are no teams of highly trained personal anxiously monitoring the health of each part of our products. Most of us work on systems with far less human intervention.
#Fast self booting cpu stress test Patch#
We hear of NASA spacecraft from time to time whose core or RAM develops a few bad bits, yet somehow the engineers patch their code to operate around the faulty areas, uploading the corrections over the distances of billions of miles. Some embedded systems are pretty tolerant of memory problems. Often you'd rather have a system that just doesn't boot, rather than one that occasionally returns incorrect answers. Problems, especially intermittent ones, in the data areas may manifest bugs in subtle ways. Errors reading from the stack will sure crash the code. Obviously, a RAM problem will destroy most embedded systems.
#Fast self booting cpu stress test free#
Suggestion: Subscribe to my free newsletter which often covers test issues. I read a lot of code - a lot - and it's rare to find a RAM test that makes much sense. This page describes how RAM really fails, and provides tests that will detect these failures.ĭevelopers often adhere to beliefs about the right way to test RAM that are as polarized as disparate feelings about politics and religion. Nearly none of the RAM test code I see is any good - these tests simply don't look for the kinds of errors we see in RAM these days. Testing RAM in Embedded Systems, by Jack Ganssle For novel ideas about building embedded systems (both hardware and firmware), join the 40,000+ engineers who subscribe to The Embedded Muse, a free biweekly newsletter.
0 kommentar(er)
